Assurance & Compliance
Can we prove the controls work? Evidence assembled from work that actually happened, not from a spreadsheet written the week before the audit.
The signals read, and the work prescribed against them.
The summary of each is on the surface. Open one for the specific dimensions behind it.
SignalsWhat IO reads for this domain4 signal and evidence families, correlated deterministically rather than inferred.
- Control test results and owner attestations
- Framework mappings and scope records
- Findings, remediation state and due dates
- Completed playbook records as evidence
PlaybooksWhat IO prescribes3 representative playbooks, each gated on prerequisites and maturity.
- Refresh the evidence for controls past validity
- Tune the detections behind the slowest incidents
- Burn down open findings by owner
SeatsWho lands here first3 seats read this domain before anyone else does.
- Governance, risk and compliance
- CISO
- CFO
What has to move for this to have worked.
Controls with current, dated evidence
Findings closed and verified, not just closed
Repeat findings across cycles
Observed behaviour, reported culture and completed learning held as one position, and re-measured on the behaviour, not the completion record.
Detections that arrive from tooling rather than a colleague's message, and where the identity pressure is actually landing.
Which AI tools are really in use, what data reaches them, and whether the written guardrails are the ones in force.
See it before you talk to anyone.
Two quarters of recorded activity across sixteen seats. One click, no install.